Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2007 ›
CO ›
COPELAND DIGITAL SCROLL
Trademark search for:
COPELAND DIGITAL SCROLL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-02-13 — Application filed
2007-02-17 — Application filed
2007-06-01 — Assigned to examiner
2007-06-14 — Priority action written
2007-06-14 — Priority action e-mailed
2007-06-14 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
2007-08-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-08-14 — Office action issued
2007-08-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-08-27 — Examiners amendment -written
2007-08-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-08-27 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2007-08-27 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2007-08-27 — Examiner's amendment entered
2007-09-26 — Assigned to lie
2007-09-27 — Law office publication review completed
2007-10-10 — Notice of publication
2007-10-30 — Published for opposition
2008-01-22 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-07-22 — Sou teas extension received
2008-07-22 — Sou extension 1 filed
2008-07-22 — Sou extension 1 granted
2008-11-26 — Assigned to examiner
2009-02-23 — Application abandoned
2009-02-23 — Application abandoned
2009-02-23 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Emerson Climate Technologies, Inc.
Sidney , OH
Emerson Climate Technologies, Inc.
Sidney , OH
Correspondent
Michael P. Brennan, Michael Malinzak & Lisa M. DuR HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C. PO BOX 828 BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303-0828 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-02-13
Status Date:
2009-02-23
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.