Trademark search for:

DEMONSTRATIVE THOUGHT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2011-01-13 — Application filed
2011-01-17 — Application filed
2011-01-20 — Application filed
2011-04-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-04-04 — Assigned to examiner
2011-04-18 — Assigned to lie
2011-04-21 — Law office publication review completed
2011-05-24 — Published for opposition
2011-05-24 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2011-07-19 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-07-25 — Teas statement of use received
2011-07-25 — Use amendment filed
2011-08-12 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2011-08-16 — Statement of use processing complete
2011-09-01 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2011-09-01 — Law office registration review completed
2011-09-02 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2011-10-04 — Registered-principal register
2017-05-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
2018-03-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
2018-05-11 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2018-05-11 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Montelbano, Lori Ann
Maywood , IL

Montelbano, Joseph James
Maywood , IL

Montelbano, Lori Ann
Maywood , IL

Montelbano, Joseph James
Maywood , IL

Montelbano, Lori Ann
Maywood , IL

Montelbano, Joseph James
Maywood , IL

Correspondent

MARCUS STEPHEN HARRIS Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
111 East Wacker Drive
Suite 2800
CHICAGO, IL 60601

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2011-01-13

Status Date:
2018-05-11

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2007

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.