Brandinium

Trademark search for:

DF RAPTOR

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2005-11-10 — Application filed
  • 2005-11-16 — Application filed
  • 2006-05-16 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-05-24 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-05-24 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-10-25 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-10-25 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-04-25 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2007-04-25 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-10-24 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2007-10-29 — Paper received
  • 2007-12-06 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2007-12-06 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-12-06 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-04-22 — Data modification completed
  • 2008-07-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-07-17 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-07-30 — Notice of publication
  • 2008-08-19 — Published for opposition
  • 2008-11-11 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2009-03-17 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-03-17 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2009-05-04 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-05-04 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2009-05-19 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2009-05-19 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2009-07-21 — Paper received
  • 2009-07-23 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2009-11-11 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2009-12-09 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-12-09 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2009-12-09 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2009-12-09 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2009-12-11 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2009-12-11 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2009-12-11 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2009-12-15 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2010-05-11 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-05-11 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2010-05-13 — Office action issued
  • 2010-06-07 — Office action issued
  • 2010-06-07 — Office action issued
  • 2010-06-09 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-06-09 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-06-10 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2010-06-10 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2010-06-10 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2010-06-18 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2010-06-18 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2010-06-24 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2010-06-25 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2010-11-11 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2010-11-11 — Use amendment filed
  • 2010-11-15 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2010-11-23 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2010-12-15 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2010-12-15 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-12-16 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2011-01-18 — Registered-principal register
  • 2013-01-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2015-01-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2016-01-18 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2017-08-25 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2017-08-25 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

DIGITAL FOUNTAIN, INC.
San Diego , CA
DIGITAL FOUNTAIN, INC.
San Diego , CA
DIGITAL FOUNTAIN, INC.
FREMONT , CA
Sumitomo Electric Networks, Inc.
Tokyo JP

Correspondent

N. Christopher Norton, Esq. Arent Fox LLP
1717 K St., NW
Washington, DC 20006-5344
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-11-10
Status Date:
2017-08-25
Filing Year:
2007

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.