Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2007 ›
DI ›
DIABETIC SOLUTION
Trademark search for:
DIABETIC SOLUTION
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-11-16 — Application filed
2007-11-20 — Application filed
2008-02-20 — Assigned to examiner
2008-02-25 — Final disposition recorded
2008-02-25 — Final disposition recorded
2008-02-25 — Final disposition recorded
2008-03-12 — Office action issued
2008-03-12 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-03-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-04-14 — Office action issued
2008-04-14 — Office action issued
2008-04-14 — Office action issued
2008-07-29 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2008-07-29 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2008-07-29 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2008-07-29 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2008-07-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-07-30 — Assigned to lie
2008-07-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-08-27 — Final disposition recorded
2008-08-27 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
2008-08-27 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
2008-09-30 — Exparte appeal terminated
2008-10-01 — Application abandoned
2008-10-01 — Exparte appeal terminated
2008-10-01 — Exparte appeal terminated
2008-10-01 — Final status recorded
2008-10-10 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Product Partners, LLC
Beverly Hills , CA
Correspondent
CAMILLE M. MILLER COZEN O'CONNOR 1900 MARKET ST PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3527 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-11-16
Status Date:
2008-10-01
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.