Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2007 ›
EM ›
EMOD LEARNING SYSTEMS
Trademark search for:
EMOD LEARNING SYSTEMS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-01-05 — Application filed
2007-01-09 — Application filed
2007-01-10 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2007-04-25 — Assigned to examiner
2007-05-01 — Priority action written
2007-05-01 — Priority action e-mailed
2007-05-08 — Priority action written
2007-05-08 — Priority action e-mailed
2007-12-04 — Application abandoned
2007-12-04 — Application abandoned
2008-01-29 — Office action issued
2008-01-29 — Petition to revive-granted
2008-01-29 — Assigned to examiner
2008-01-29 — Teas petition to revive received
2008-02-29 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
2008-02-29 — Assigned to lie
2008-02-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-03-04 — Suspension letter written
2008-03-04 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-03-04 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-09-04 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2009-03-04 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2009-09-04 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2010-03-04 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2010-09-10 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2010-09-23 — Final disposition recorded
2010-09-23 — Final disposition recorded
2010-09-23 — Final disposition recorded
2011-04-21 — Application abandoned
2011-04-21 — Application abandoned
2011-04-21 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Richard D Jorgensen
Chula Vista , CA
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-01-05
Status Date:
2011-04-21
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.