Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2007 ›
GE ›
GEM BEAUTY
Trademark search for:
GEM BEAUTY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-09-08 — Application filed
2010-09-11 — Application filed
2010-09-11 — Application filed
2010-12-17 — Assigned to examiner
2010-12-23 — Priority action written
2010-12-23 — Priority action e-mailed
2010-12-23 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
2011-06-08 — Office action issued
2011-06-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-06-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-06-21 — Final disposition recorded
2011-06-21 — Final disposition recorded
2011-06-21 — Final disposition recorded
2011-12-21 — Office action issued
2011-12-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-12-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-01-06 — Office action issued
2012-01-06 — Office action issued
2012-01-06 — Office action issued
2012-07-06 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2012-07-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-07-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-07-20 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
2012-07-20 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
2012-07-20 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
2013-02-15 — Application abandoned
2013-02-15 — Application abandoned
2013-02-15 — Final status recorded
Correspondent
THOMAS M. HARDMAN AUSTIN RAPP & HARDMAN 170 S MAIN ST STE 735 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101-1657 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-09-08
Status Date:
2013-02-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.