Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2007 ›
IN ›
INTELECOM ONLINE
Trademark search for:
INTELECOM ONLINE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-07-13 — Application filed
2007-07-18 — Application filed
2007-10-04 — Assigned to examiner
2007-10-05 — Final disposition recorded
2007-10-05 — Final disposition recorded
2008-01-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-01-29 — Office action issued
2008-01-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-01-31 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-02-27 — Assigned to lie
2008-02-27 — Law office publication review completed
2008-03-12 — Notice of publication
2008-04-01 — Published for opposition
2008-06-24 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-12-18 — Sou teas extension received
2008-12-18 — Sou extension 1 filed
2008-12-18 — Sou extension 1 granted
2009-06-22 — Sou teas extension received
2009-06-22 — Sou extension 2 filed
2009-07-15 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-07-15 — Sou extension 2 granted
2009-12-10 — Sou teas extension received
2009-12-10 — Sou extension 3 filed
2009-12-14 — Sou extension 3 granted
2010-07-26 — Application abandoned
2010-07-26 — Application abandoned
2010-07-26 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
INTELECOM Intelligent Telecommunications
Pasadena , CA
INTELECOM Intelligent Telecommunications
Pasadena , CA
Correspondent
JONATHAN KIRSCH LAW OFFICES OF JONATHAN KIRSCH 1880 CENTURY PARK E STE 515 LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-1607 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-07-13
Status Date:
2010-07-26
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.