Brandinium

Trademark search for:

LITTLE MISS DAREDEVIL

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2007-10-24 — Application filed
  • 2007-10-29 — Application filed
  • 2007-10-30 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2007-12-18 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-12-21 — Priority action written
  • 2007-12-26 — Priority action mailed
  • 2008-06-30 — Paper received
  • 2008-07-02 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2008-07-02 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-07-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-08-07 — Suspension letter written
  • 2008-08-08 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2008-08-22 — Data modification completed
  • 2009-02-11 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2009-03-04 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2009-03-05 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2009-05-04 — Paper received
  • 2009-05-05 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2009-05-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-05-07 — Examiner's amendment/priority action mailed
  • 2009-05-07 — Combined examiner's amendment/priority action entered
  • 2009-05-07 — Examiners amendment and/or priority action - completed
  • 2009-05-21 — Paper received
  • 2009-05-22 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2009-05-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-06-12 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2009-06-12 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-06-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-06-12 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-06-23 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-07-04 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2009-07-14 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2009-07-15 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2009-07-15 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-07-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-07-15 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-07-16 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-07-29 — Notice of publication
  • 2009-08-18 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-08-26 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2009-11-25 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-11-25 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2009-12-16 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
  • 2010-02-12 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
  • 2011-04-05 — Ttab release case to trademarks
  • 2011-04-05 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
  • 2011-04-05 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
  • 2011-04-08 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2011-04-08 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2011-05-10 — Registered-principal register
  • 2011-08-31 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2011-08-31 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2012-01-04 — Request to cancel inadvertently issued registration received
  • 2012-01-04 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
  • 2012-01-04 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
  • 2012-01-05 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2012-01-18 — Reg. cancelled - restored to pendency
  • 2012-02-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2012-04-17 — Registered-principal register
  • 2017-01-31 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2017-04-05 — Review of correspondence complete - address updated
  • 2018-11-23 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2018-11-23 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

THOIP
London GB
THOIP
London GB
THOIP
London GB

Correspondent

Lawrence E. Apolzon Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOOR
New York, NY 10036
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2007-10-24
Status Date:
2018-11-23
Category:
Electronics & Software
Filing Year:
2007

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.