Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2007 ›
PA ›
PARROT MINIKIT
Trademark search for:
PARROT MINIKIT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-03-29 — Application filed
2007-04-03 — Application filed
2007-04-04 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2007-05-29 — Paper received
2007-06-13 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
2007-06-13 — Assigned to lie
2007-07-09 — Assigned to examiner
2007-07-24 — Final disposition recorded
2007-07-24 — Final disposition recorded
2007-07-24 — Final disposition recorded
2008-01-28 — Paper received
2008-02-28 — Amendment from applicant entered
2008-02-28 — Assigned to lie
2008-02-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-04-03 — Suspension letter written
2008-04-03 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-04-03 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-10-08 — Assigned to lie
2008-10-08 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2008-10-30 — Suspension inquiry written
2008-10-30 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2008-10-30 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2008-12-23 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2008-12-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-12-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-01-29 — Office action issued
2009-01-29 — Office action issued
2009-01-29 — Office action issued
2009-06-19 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
2009-06-19 — Teas voluntary amendment received
2009-07-15 — Final disposition recorded
2009-07-15 — Final disposition recorded
2009-07-15 — Office action issued
2009-07-16 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2009-07-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-07-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-07-29 — Examiners amendment -written
2009-07-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-07-29 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-07-29 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-07-29 — Examiner's amendment entered
2009-07-30 — Law office publication review completed
2009-08-12 — Notice of publication
2009-09-01 — Published for opposition
2009-11-24 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-05-24 — Sou teas extension received
2010-05-24 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-05-24 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-05-26 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2010-11-23 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
2010-11-23 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2010-11-24 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-11-26 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
2011-01-04 — Registered-principal register
2011-03-03 — Fax received
2011-04-05 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2011-04-06 — Review of correspondence complete
2015-04-01 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2015-04-01 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2016-01-04 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2016-06-29 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2016-10-19 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2016-12-28 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2017-03-03 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2017-03-04 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2017-03-04 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2020-01-04 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2021-08-06 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2021-08-06 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
PARROT DRONES
PARIS FR
PARROT
Paris FR
PARROT
Paris FR
PARROT
Paris FR
Correspondent
Jill Anderfuren Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP 550 West Adams Street Suite 300 Chicago, IL 60661
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-03-29
Status Date:
2021-08-06
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.