Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2007 ›
RO ›
ROYAL FELT
Trademark search for:
ROYAL FELT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-09-26 — Application filed
2007-10-01 — Application filed
2007-12-29 — Assigned to examiner
2007-12-31 — Final disposition recorded
2007-12-31 — Final disposition recorded
2007-12-31 — Final disposition recorded
2008-01-16 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received
2008-01-16 — Withdrawal of attorney granted
2008-06-27 — Office action issued
2008-06-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-06-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-07-22 — Office action issued
2008-07-23 — Office action issued
2009-01-22 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2009-01-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-01-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-01-28 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-02-06 — Assigned to lie
2009-02-06 — Law office publication review completed
2009-02-25 — Notice of publication
2009-03-17 — Published for opposition
2009-06-09 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-01-11 — Application abandoned
2010-01-11 — Application abandoned
2010-03-15 — Teas due diligence petition received
2010-03-16 — Assigned to petition staff
2010-03-22 — Petition to revive-denied
2010-03-22 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
SBL Ventures, Inc.
New York , NY
SBL Ventures, Inc.
New York , NY
Correspondent
SBL Ventures, Inc. 215 East 68th Street, Suite 5-O New York, NY 10021 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-09-26
Status Date:
2010-03-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.