Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2007 ›
TI ›
TICKETTRAX
Trademark search for:
TICKETTRAX
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-12-04 — Application filed
2007-12-07 — Application filed
2007-12-08 — Notice of design search code mailed
2008-03-14 — Final disposition recorded
2008-03-14 — Final disposition recorded
2008-03-14 — Assigned to examiner
2008-03-14 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-09-15 — Office action issued
2008-09-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-10-08 — Suspension letter written
2008-10-08 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-10-08 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-11-22 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2008-11-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-11-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-12-18 — Final disposition recorded
2008-12-18 — Final disposition recorded
2008-12-18 — Final disposition recorded
2009-02-11 — Office action issued
2009-02-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-02-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-02-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-02-21 — Assigned to lie
2009-02-21 — Law office publication review completed
2009-03-09 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2009-03-13 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2009-03-17 — Final disposition recorded
2009-03-17 — Final disposition recorded
2009-03-17 — Final disposition recorded
2009-08-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-08-06 — Office action issued
2009-08-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-08-07 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-08-07 — Law office publication review completed
2009-08-26 — Notice of publication
2009-09-15 — Published for opposition
2009-12-08 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-06-08 — Sou teas extension received
2010-06-08 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-06-08 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-06-10 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2010-12-08 — Sou teas extension received
2010-12-08 — Sou extension 2 filed
2011-01-06 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2011-01-06 — Sou extension 2 granted
2011-01-07 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-06-08 — Sou teas extension received
2011-06-08 — Sou extension 3 filed
2011-06-09 — Sou extension 3 granted
2011-06-10 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-12-01 — Sou teas extension received
2011-12-01 — Sou extension 4 filed
2011-12-02 — Sou extension 4 granted
2011-12-03 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-06-08 — Teas statement of use received
2012-06-08 — Use amendment filed
2012-06-10 — Statement of use processing complete
2012-06-18 — Final disposition recorded
2012-06-18 — Final disposition recorded
2012-06-18 — Final disposition recorded
2012-12-10 — Office action issued
2012-12-12 — Assigned to lie
2012-12-20 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2012-12-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-12-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-12-29 — Law office registration review completed
2013-01-01 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2013-02-05 — Registered-principal register
2018-02-05 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2019-09-06 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2019-09-06 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
DataTrax Technologies Inc.
Toronto CA
DataTrax Technologies Inc.
Toronto CA
DataTrax Technologies Inc.
Toronto CA
Correspondent
FREDERICK W. MEYERS LADAS & PARRY LLP 224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600 CHICAGO, IL 60604-2508 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-12-04
Status Date:
2019-09-06
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.