Brandinium

Trademark search for:

((TRUPHONE))

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2013-01-25 — Application filed
  • 2013-01-29 — Application filed
  • 2013-01-31 — Application filed
  • 2013-02-01 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2013-05-08 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2013-05-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-05-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-05-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-11-11 — Office action issued
  • 2013-11-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-11-14 — Assigned to lie
  • 2013-11-14 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-12-11 — Office action issued
  • 2013-12-11 — Office action issued
  • 2013-12-11 — Office action issued
  • 2014-06-11 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2014-06-11 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2014-06-11 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2014-06-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-06-11 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2014-06-11 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-07-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-07-10 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2014-07-10 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2014-08-20 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2014-09-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-09-29 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2014-09-29 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2014-11-10 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2014-12-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-12-23 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2014-12-23 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2015-01-14 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2015-01-14 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2015-02-11 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2015-03-25 — Priority action written
  • 2015-03-25 — Priority action e-mailed
  • 2015-03-25 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
  • 2015-07-31 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-07-31 — Office action issued
  • 2015-07-31 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-08-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-08-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-08-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-02-01 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2016-02-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2016-02-01 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2016-02-01 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2016-02-01 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2016-02-01 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2016-02-05 — Assigned to lie
  • 2016-02-06 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2016-02-24 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2016-03-15 — Published for opposition
  • 2016-03-15 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2016-05-10 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2016-06-01 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
  • 2016-06-01 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2016-06-25 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2016-07-12 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
  • 2016-08-16 — Registered-principal register
  • 2021-08-16 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2023-03-03 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2023-03-03 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

TRUPHONE LIMITED
Canary Wharf, London GB
TRUPHONE LIMITED
Canary Wharf, London GB
TRUPHONE LIMITED
Canary Wharf, London GB

Correspondent

LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST SUGHRUE MION PLLC
2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW SUITE 800
WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2013-01-25
Status Date:
2023-03-03
Filing Year:
2007

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.