Trademark search for:

VISIONARM

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2007-09-17 — Application filed
2007-09-21 — Application filed
2007-09-25 — Application filed
2007-12-20 — Final disposition recorded
2007-12-20 — Assigned to examiner
2007-12-21 — Final disposition recorded
2008-05-19 — Paper received
2008-05-21 — Amendment from applicant entered
2008-05-21 — Assigned to lie
2008-05-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-05-22 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-05-23 — Law office publication review completed
2008-06-11 — Notice of publication
2008-07-01 — Published for opposition
2008-09-23 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2009-03-16 — Paper received
2009-03-16 — Sou extension 1 filed
2009-04-06 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-04-06 — Sou extension 1 granted
2009-09-21 — Paper received
2009-09-21 — Sou extension 2 filed
2009-09-24 — Sou extension 2 granted
2010-02-26 — Sou extension 3 filed
2010-03-01 — Paper received
2010-03-12 — Sou extension 3 granted
2010-08-30 — Paper received
2010-08-30 — Sou extension 4 filed
2010-09-10 — Sou extension 4 granted
2010-09-11 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2011-04-25 — Application abandoned
2011-04-25 — Application abandoned
2011-04-25 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Smart Robots, Inc.
Dalton , MA

Smart Robots, Inc.
Dalton , MA

Correspondent

LLOYD L. RICH LAW OFFICE OF LLOYD L. RICH, PC
1163 VINE ST
DENVER, CO 80206-2906
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2007-09-17

Status Date:
2011-04-25

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2007

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.