Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2008 ›
06 ›
600HZ SUB-FIELD DRIVE
Trademark search for:
600HZ SUB-FIELD DRIVE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-12-01 — Application filed
2008-12-04 — Application filed
2008-12-05 — Notice of design search code mailed
2009-02-02 — Assigned to examiner
2009-02-09 — Final disposition recorded
2009-02-09 — Final disposition recorded
2009-02-09 — Final disposition recorded
2009-07-08 — Office action issued
2009-07-22 — Assigned to lie
2009-07-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-07-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-07-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-07-24 — Law office publication review completed
2009-08-12 — Notice of publication
2009-09-01 — Published for opposition
2009-11-24 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2009-12-10 — Teas statement of use received
2009-12-10 — Use amendment filed
2010-01-24 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-01-24 — Statement of use processing complete
2010-01-28 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2010-02-02 — Law office registration review completed
2010-03-09 — Registered-principal register
2016-10-14 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2016-10-14 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Panasonic Corporation
Osaka JP
Panasonic Corporation
Osaka JP
Panasonic Corporation
Osaka JP
Correspondent
GREGORY A. STOBBS / GARRETT C. DONLEY HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C. 5445 CORPORATE DR STE 200 TROY, MI 48098-2683 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-12-01
Status Date:
2016-10-14
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.