Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2008 ›
CA ›
CAT-IQ
Trademark search for:
CAT-IQ
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-11-27 — Application filed
2009-08-20 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2009-08-21 — Application filed
2009-08-21 — Assigned to examiner
2009-08-25 — Application filed
2009-08-30 — Final disposition recorded
2009-08-31 — Office action issued
2009-08-31 — Office action issued
2009-08-31 — Office action issued
2009-09-29 — Office action issued
2010-03-01 — Teas change of correspondence received
2010-03-03 — Paper received
2010-03-17 — Amendment from applicant entered
2010-03-17 — Assigned to lie
2010-03-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-03-20 — Data modification completed
2010-04-07 — Office action issued
2010-04-08 — Office action issued
2010-04-19 — Office action issued
2010-04-20 — Office action issued
2010-07-15 — Change of owner received from ib
2010-07-26 — Paper received
2010-08-10 — Amendment from applicant entered
2010-08-10 — Assigned to lie
2010-08-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-08-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-08-26 — Law office publication review completed
2010-09-08 — Notice of publication
2010-09-28 — Published for opposition
2010-12-14 — Registered-principal register
2011-03-14 — Final disposition recorded
2011-04-14 — Final disposition recorded
2011-04-14 — Final disposition recorded
2011-07-30 — Limitation of goods received from ib
2011-08-10 — Correction under section 7 - processed
2011-08-10 — Assigned to paralegal
2011-08-11 — Limitation from the ib examined and entered
2012-05-10 — Partial invalidation of reg ext protection created
2013-02-18 — Final disposition recorded
2013-03-09 — New representative at ib received
2013-06-27 — Invalidation reviewed - no action required by office
2013-11-12 — Limitation of goods received from ib
2013-11-13 — Correction transaction received from ib
2013-12-17 — Correction from the ib examined, no action is needed
2015-03-31 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2015-03-31 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2015-12-14 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (6-yr) e-mailed
2016-08-11 — New representative at ib received
2016-12-06 — Teas section 71 & 15 received
2017-05-08 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2017-05-17 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 71 & 15 - e-mailed
2017-05-17 — Registered - partial sec. 71 accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2017-11-02 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2017-11-02 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2018-01-17 — Partial invalidation of reg ext protection created
2018-01-26 — Partial invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
2018-01-26 — Invalidation processed
2018-03-16 — Partial invalidation processed by the ib
2018-12-13 — International registration renewed
2019-03-21 — New representative at ib received
2019-12-14 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (10-yr) e-mailed
2021-03-26 — New representative at ib received
2021-03-26 — New representative at ib received
2021-06-25 — Cancelled section 71
2021-06-25 — Final status recorded
2022-02-25 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
2022-06-17 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
2022-06-17 — Invalidation processed
2022-07-24 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
Owner Information
DECT Forum
CH-3000 Bern 23 CH
DECT Forum
CH
DECT Forum
CH
DECT FORUM
CH-3000 Bern CH
Correspondent
J. Roger Williams, Jr. Richards, Rodriguez & Skeith, LLP 816 Congress Ave. Suite 1200 Austin, TX 78701
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-11-27
Status Date:
2021-06-25
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.