Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CDGFIX

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2008-04-04 — Application filed
  • 2008-04-08 — Application filed
  • 2008-04-09 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2008-04-14 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2008-04-17 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
  • 2008-04-17 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-07-16 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-07-16 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-07-16 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-07-16 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-07-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-07-29 — Office action issued
  • 2008-07-29 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-08-06 — Office action issued
  • 2008-08-06 — Office action issued
  • 2008-08-06 — Office action issued
  • 2008-08-07 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-08-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-08-07 — Office action issued
  • 2008-08-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-08-08 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-08-18 — Suspension letter written
  • 2008-08-18 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-08-18 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-08-18 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2008-08-18 — Withdrawn from pub - examining attorney request
  • 2009-02-26 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2009-04-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-04-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-04-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-10-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-10-09 — Correspondence e-mailed
  • 2009-10-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-10-09 — Office action issued
  • 2009-10-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-10-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-10-29 — Office action issued
  • 2009-10-29 — Office action issued
  • 2009-10-29 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-10-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-11-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-11-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-11-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-12-07 — Office action issued
  • 2009-12-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-12-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-12-08 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-12-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-12-15 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-01-19 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-01-19 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-04-06 — Registered-principal register
  • 2015-04-06 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2016-02-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2016-02-05 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2016-04-02 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2016-04-02 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2016-04-02 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2019-04-06 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2020-03-18 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2020-05-29 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2020-05-29 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 9
  • 2020-12-03 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)
  • 2020-12-03 — Final status recorded
  • 2020-12-04 — Notice of cancellation sec. 8 emailed

Owner Information

Ørseng, Mikael
Kråkerøy NO
Sundqvist, Kim
Kråkerøy NO
Ørseng, Mikael
Kråkerøy NO
Sundqvist, Kim
Kråkerøy NO
Ørseng, Mikael
Kråkerøy NO
Sundqvist, Kim
Kråkerøy NO

Correspondent

Randy L. New, Esq. Kitchens New Cleghorn, LLC
2973 Hardman Court NE
Atlanta, GA 30305
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-04-04
Status Date:
2020-12-03
Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.