Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2008 ›
CI ›
CITY & GUILDS
Trademark search for:
CITY & GUILDS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-03-07 — Application filed
2008-03-12 — Application filed
2008-03-13 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2008-06-17 — Assigned to examiner
2008-06-24 — Final disposition recorded
2008-06-24 — Final disposition recorded
2008-06-24 — Final disposition recorded
2008-12-23 — Office action issued
2009-01-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-01-07 — Assigned to lie
2009-01-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-01-28 — Suspension letter written
2009-01-28 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2009-01-28 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2009-07-28 — Suspension inquiry written
2009-07-28 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2009-07-28 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2010-01-27 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2010-01-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-01-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-02-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-02-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-02-19 — Final disposition recorded
2010-02-19 — Final disposition recorded
2010-02-19 — Final disposition recorded
2010-09-30 — Application abandoned
2010-09-30 — Application abandoned
2010-09-30 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
The City and Guilds of London Institute
London GB
Correspondent
RAMON A. KLITZKE II KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 121 SW SALMON STREET ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER, SUITE 1600 PORTLAND, OR 97204
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-03-07
Status Date:
2010-09-30
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.