Brandinium

Trademark search for:

COMPARIO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2008-03-14 — Application filed
  • 2008-03-19 — Application filed
  • 2008-06-22 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-06-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-06-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-06-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-01-12 — Office action issued
  • 2009-01-12 — Petition to revive-received
  • 2009-01-12 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-01-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-01-29 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2009-02-10 — Petition granted - response received
  • 2009-02-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-02-13 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-02-13 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-02-19 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-02-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-02-19 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-02-19 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-02-19 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-02-23 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-03-11 — Notice of publication
  • 2009-03-31 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-06-23 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2009-11-24 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-11-24 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2009-11-24 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2010-05-28 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-05-28 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2010-05-28 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2010-06-01 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2010-12-21 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-12-21 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2010-12-21 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2010-12-23 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-05-09 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-05-09 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2011-05-11 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2011-05-11 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2011-05-12 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-12-02 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-12-02 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2011-12-02 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2011-12-06 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-06-21 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2012-06-21 — Use amendment filed
  • 2012-06-26 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2012-07-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-07-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-07-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-08-28 — Office action issued
  • 2012-08-30 — Assigned to lie
  • 2012-09-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-09-18 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-10-03 — Office action issued
  • 2012-10-03 — Office action issued
  • 2012-10-03 — Office action issued
  • 2012-11-08 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2012-11-18 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2012-11-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-11-18 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-11-26 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2012-11-27 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2013-01-01 — Registered-principal register
  • 2016-05-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-01-01 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2019-08-02 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2019-08-02 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

COMPARIO
Lille FR
COMPARIO
Lille FR
COMPARIO
Lille FR

Correspondent

C. BRUCE HAMBURG Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, PA
875 Third Avenue, 8th Floor
NEW YORK, NY 10022
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-03-14
Status Date:
2019-08-02
Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.