Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2008 ›
EL ›
ELECTRONIC CANARY
Trademark search for:
ELECTRONIC CANARY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-06-05 — Application filed
2008-06-09 — Application filed
2008-09-16 — Examiners amendment -written
2008-09-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-09-16 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2008-09-16 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2008-09-16 — Examiner's amendment entered
2008-09-16 — Assigned to examiner
2008-09-25 — Assigned to lie
2008-09-26 — Law office publication review completed
2008-10-15 — Notice of publication
2008-11-04 — Published for opposition
2009-01-27 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2009-07-27 — Sou extension 1 filed
2009-08-31 — Application abandoned
2009-08-31 — Application abandoned
2009-10-06 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2009-10-06 — Petition to revive-granted
2009-10-06 — Teas petition to revive received
2009-10-29 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-10-30 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-01-26 — Sou teas extension received
2010-01-26 — Sou extension 2 filed
2010-02-08 — Sou extension 2 granted
2010-08-30 — Application abandoned
2010-08-30 — Application abandoned
2010-08-30 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Srivastava, Santosh K.
La Crescenta , CA
Srivastava, Santosh K.
La Crescenta , CA
Correspondent
SRIVASTAVA, SANTOSH K. CONTEMPORARY DEVICES COMPANY, INC. 3755 LOS OLIVOS LN LA CRESCENTA, CA 91214-1733 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-06-05
Status Date:
2010-08-30
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.