Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2008 ›
GU ›
GUIN SAGA
Trademark search for:
GUIN SAGA
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-12-26 — Application filed
2009-08-06 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2009-08-07 — Application filed
2009-08-07 — Assigned to examiner
2009-08-11 — Application filed
2009-08-23 — Final disposition recorded
2009-08-24 — Final disposition recorded
2009-08-24 — Office action issued
2009-08-24 — Office action issued
2009-08-25 — Office action issued
2009-08-26 — Office action issued
2009-08-26 — Office action issued
2009-09-29 — Office action issued
2010-02-02 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2010-02-02 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2010-02-18 — Office action issued
2010-03-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-03-11 — Assigned to lie
2010-03-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-04-02 — Limitation of goods received from ib
2010-04-28 — Combined examiner's amendment/priority action entered
2010-04-28 — Examiners amendment and/or priority action - completed
2010-04-28 — Notification of examiner's amendment/priority action e-mailed
2010-04-28 — Examiner's amendment/priority action e-mailed
2010-05-13 — Attorney review completed
2010-05-13 — Limitation of goods/services from ib entered
2010-10-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-10-25 — Office action issued
2010-10-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-10-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-11-01 — Law office publication review completed
2010-12-07 — Published for opposition
2010-12-07 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2011-01-06 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2011-01-06 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2011-01-21 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2011-02-22 — Registered-principal register
2011-05-22 — Final disposition recorded
2011-06-17 — Final disposition recorded
2011-06-17 — Final disposition recorded
2013-02-24 — Final disposition recorded
2017-02-15 — Teas section 71 & 15 received
2017-06-08 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2017-06-08 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 71 & 15 - e-mailed
2017-06-08 — Registered - partial sec. 71 accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2018-02-08 — Partial invalidation of reg ext protection created
2018-02-12 — Partial invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
2018-02-12 — Invalidation processed
2018-04-06 — Partial invalidation processed by the ib
2019-01-10 — International registration renewed
2020-02-22 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (10-yr) e-mailed
2020-05-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2020-05-20 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
2020-05-20 — Teas change of owner address received
2020-05-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
2020-05-20 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2020-05-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2020-05-20 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2020-05-27 — Review of correspondence complete - information made of record
2021-09-10 — Cancelled section 71
2021-09-10 — Final status recorded
2022-05-10 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
2022-08-04 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
2022-08-04 — Invalidation processed
2022-08-28 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
Owner Information
Aniplex Inc.
JP
Aniplex Inc.
JP
Aniplex Inc.
JP
Correspondent
Richard Y. Kim SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 400 East Van Buren Street, Suite 1900 One Arizona Center Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-12-26
Status Date:
2021-09-10
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.