Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2008 ›
MO ›
MOVIEPLUS
Trademark search for:
MOVIEPLUS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-11-25 — Application filed
2008-12-01 — Application filed
2008-12-02 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2009-02-25 — Assigned to examiner
2009-03-04 — Final disposition recorded
2009-03-04 — Final disposition recorded
2009-03-04 — Final disposition recorded
2009-06-25 — Office action issued
2009-06-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-06-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-07-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-07-17 — Assigned to lie
2009-07-17 — Law office publication review completed
2009-08-05 — Notice of publication
2009-08-25 — Published for opposition
2009-11-17 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-05-17 — Use amendment filed
2010-05-19 — Paper received
2010-06-02 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-06-07 — Statement of use processing complete
2010-06-09 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2010-06-10 — Law office registration review completed
2010-06-11 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2010-07-13 — Registered-principal register
2017-02-17 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2017-02-17 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
SERIF (EUROPE) LIMITED
Nottingham GB
SERIF (EUROPE) LIMITED
Nottingham GB
SERIF (EUROPE) LIMITED
Nottingham GB
Correspondent
ROBERT L. POWLEY POWLEY & GIBSON, P.C. 304 HUDSON ST FL 2 NEW YORK, NY 10013-1027 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-11-25
Status Date:
2017-02-17
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.