Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2008 ›
PR ›
PRESTOLITE PERFORMANCE
Trademark search for:
PRESTOLITE PERFORMANCE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-02-21 — Application filed
2008-02-28 — Application filed
2008-02-29 — Notice of design search code mailed
2008-04-28 — Assigned to examiner
2008-04-30 — Final disposition recorded
2008-04-30 — Final disposition recorded
2008-04-30 — Final disposition recorded
2008-10-21 — Assigned to examiner
2008-10-30 — Office action issued
2008-10-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-10-31 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-12-01 — Suspension letter written
2008-12-01 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-12-01 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2009-06-01 — Assigned to lie
2009-06-01 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2009-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
2009-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
2009-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
2009-12-19 — Office action issued
2009-12-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-12-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-01-05 — Examiners amendment -written
2010-01-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-01-05 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2010-01-05 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2010-01-05 — Examiner's amendment entered
2010-01-06 — Assigned to lie
2010-01-07 — Law office publication review completed
2010-01-15 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2010-01-19 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2010-01-25 — Final disposition recorded
2010-01-25 — Final disposition recorded
2010-01-25 — Final disposition recorded
2010-07-26 — Office action issued
2010-07-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-07-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-08-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-08-17 — Assigned to lie
2010-08-17 — Law office publication review completed
2010-08-27 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2010-09-16 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2010-09-22 — Examiners amendment -written
2010-09-22 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-09-22 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2010-09-22 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2010-09-22 — Examiner's amendment entered
2010-09-26 — Law office publication review completed
2010-11-02 — Published for opposition
2010-11-02 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-12-28 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-06-27 — Sou teas extension received
2011-06-27 — Sou extension 1 filed
2011-06-27 — Sou extension 1 granted
2011-06-29 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-12-22 — Sou teas extension received
2011-12-22 — Sou extension 2 filed
2012-01-25 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2012-01-25 — Sou extension 2 granted
2012-01-26 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-06-28 — Sou teas extension received
2012-06-28 — Sou extension 3 filed
2012-08-07 — Sou extension 3 granted
2012-08-08 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-12-17 — Sou teas extension received
2012-12-17 — Sou extension 4 filed
2012-12-20 — Sou extension 4 granted
2012-12-21 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-03-27 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2013-03-27 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2013-07-29 — Application abandoned
2013-07-29 — Application abandoned
2013-07-29 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Prestolite Wire LLC
Southfield , MI
Prestolite Wire LLC
Southfield , MI
Correspondent
Meredith M. Wilkes Jones Day 901 Lakeside Avenue Cleveland, OH 44114 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-02-21
Status Date:
2013-07-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.