Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2008 ›
ST ›
STINGER Q4
Trademark search for:
STINGER Q4
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-08-21 — Application filed
2009-08-25 — Application filed
2009-08-25 — Application filed
2009-08-26 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2009-11-25 — Final disposition recorded
2009-11-25 — Assigned to examiner
2009-11-27 — Final disposition recorded
2010-05-25 — Office action issued
2010-05-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-05-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-06-01 — Assigned to examiner
2010-07-20 — Office action issued
2010-07-20 — Office action issued
2011-01-20 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2011-01-20 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2011-01-20 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2011-01-20 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2011-01-25 — Assigned to lie
2011-02-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-02-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-02-22 — Final disposition recorded
2011-02-22 — Action denying req for recon mailed
2011-05-18 — Exparte appeal dismissed - failure to file brief
2011-05-18 — Exparte appeal dismissed - failure to file brief
2011-07-02 — Application abandoned
2011-07-02 — Exparte appeal terminated
2011-07-02 — Final status recorded
2011-07-18 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Pierce Manufacturing Inc.
Appleton , WI
Correspondent
ERIC M. SCHMALZ FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 777 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 3800 MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-5306 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-08-21
Status Date:
2011-07-02
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.