Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2009 ›
AR ›
ARCGARD
Trademark search for:
ARCGARD
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-08-12 — Application filed
2009-08-15 — Application filed
2009-08-17 — Application filed
2009-08-18 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2009-11-17 — Assigned to examiner
2009-11-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-12-09 — Assigned to lie
2009-12-09 — Law office publication review completed
2010-01-12 — Published for opposition
2010-01-12 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-04-06 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-09-24 — Sou teas extension received
2010-09-24 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-10-13 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-10-13 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-10-14 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-02-18 — Sou teas extension received
2011-02-18 — Sou extension 2 filed
2011-02-18 — Sou extension 2 granted
2011-02-22 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-09-13 — Sou teas extension received
2011-09-13 — Sou extension 3 filed
2011-09-15 — Sou extension 3 granted
2011-09-16 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-05-07 — Application abandoned
2012-05-07 — Application abandoned
2012-05-07 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Eaton Corporation
Cleveland , OH
Eaton Corporation
Cleveland , OH
Correspondent
DANIEL S. KALKA EATON CORPORATION 1111 SUPERIOR AVE E FL 19 CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2535 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-08-12
Status Date:
2012-05-07
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.