Brandinium

Trademark search for:

BACHMAN-TURNER

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2010-02-25 — Application filed
  • 2010-03-01 — Application filed
  • 2010-03-03 — Application filed
  • 2010-03-04 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2010-05-31 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2010-06-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-06-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-12-01 — Office action issued
  • 2010-12-01 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-12-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-12-13 — Suspension letter written
  • 2010-12-13 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2010-12-14 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2010-12-14 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-12-15 — Suspension letter written
  • 2010-12-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-12-16 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2011-06-21 — Assigned to lie
  • 2011-06-21 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2011-06-28 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2011-06-28 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2011-07-06 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2011-07-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-07-12 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-07-14 — Suspension letter written
  • 2011-07-15 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2011-10-04 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2011-10-04 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2012-01-19 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2012-01-24 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2012-01-25 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2012-01-31 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2012-02-05 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-02-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-02-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-02-06 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2012-08-06 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2012-08-20 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2012-08-21 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2012-08-27 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2012-08-28 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-08-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-08-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-08-29 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2013-03-11 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2013-03-24 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2013-03-25 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2013-04-11 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2013-04-18 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2013-04-18 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2013-04-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2013-04-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-04-18 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2013-04-18 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-04-20 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2013-05-08 — Notice of publication
  • 2013-05-28 — Published for opposition
  • 2013-08-13 — Registered-principal register
  • 2016-07-29 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2016-07-29 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2017-01-31 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2017-04-05 — Review of correspondence complete - address updated
  • 2020-03-20 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2020-03-20 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Ranbach Music Ltd.
Burlington, Ontario CA
Ranbach Music Ltd.
Burlington, Ontario CA
Ranbach Music Ltd.
Burlington, Ontario CA

Correspondent

LAWRENCE E. APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.
4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOOR
NEW YORK, NY 10036
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2010-02-25
Status Date:
2020-03-20
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.