Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2009 ›
CA ›
CAP 300V
Trademark search for:
CAP 300V
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-05-29 — Application filed
2009-06-02 — Application filed
2009-06-02 — Application filed
2009-06-03 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2009-08-28 — Assigned to examiner
2009-09-03 — Final disposition recorded
2009-09-03 — Final disposition recorded
2009-09-03 — Final disposition recorded
2010-03-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-03-02 — Office action issued
2010-03-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-03-09 — Office action issued
2010-03-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-03-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-03-11 — Assigned to lie
2010-03-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-03-15 — Law office publication review completed
2010-03-16 — Post publication amendment - entered
2010-04-20 — Published for opposition
2010-04-20 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-06-15 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-12-15 — Sou teas extension received
2010-12-15 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-12-15 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-12-17 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-07-18 — Application abandoned
2011-07-18 — Application abandoned
2011-07-18 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
MSC Services Corp.
Melville , NY
MSC Services Corp.
Melville , NY
Correspondent
MICHAEL R. GRAIF CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST, COLT & MOSLE LLP 101 PARK AVE FL 34 NEW YORK, NY 10178-0061 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-05-29
Status Date:
2011-07-18
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.