Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2009 ›
CH ›
CHI CENTRIC
Trademark search for:
CHI CENTRIC
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-04-04 — Application filed
2009-04-08 — Application filed
2009-04-08 — Application filed
2009-06-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-06-23 — Assigned to examiner
2009-06-30 — Assigned to lie
2009-06-30 — Law office publication review completed
2009-07-15 — Notice of publication
2009-08-04 — Published for opposition
2009-10-27 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-04-26 — Sou teas extension received
2010-04-26 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-04-26 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-04-28 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2010-10-27 — Sou teas extension received
2010-10-27 — Sou extension 2 filed
2010-11-06 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-11-06 — Sou extension 2 granted
2010-11-09 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2011-04-27 — Sou teas extension received
2011-04-27 — Sou extension 3 filed
2011-05-02 — Sou extension 3 granted
2011-05-03 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2011-09-30 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received
2011-09-30 — Withdrawal of attorney granted
2011-11-28 — Application abandoned
2011-11-28 — Application abandoned
2011-11-28 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Farouk Systems, Inc.
Houston , TX
Farouk Systems, Inc.
Houston , TX
Correspondent
Farouk Systems, Inc. 250 Pennbright, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77090 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-04-04
Status Date:
2011-11-28
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.