Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2009 ›
DD ›
DDI GROUP DIGITAL DENTAL INNOVATION
Trademark search for:
DDI GROUP DIGITAL DENTAL INNOVATION
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-04-17 — Application filed
2009-11-19 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2009-11-23 — Application filed
2009-11-23 — Assigned to examiner
2009-11-27 — Application filed
2009-11-30 — Final disposition recorded
2009-12-01 — Office action issued
2009-12-01 — Office action issued
2009-12-01 — Office action issued
2010-01-01 — Office action issued
2010-06-01 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2010-06-01 — Teas change of correspondence received
2010-06-01 — Office action issued
2010-06-01 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2010-06-09 — Assigned to lie
2010-06-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-06-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-07-12 — Office action issued
2010-07-13 — Office action issued
2011-01-11 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2011-01-11 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2011-01-11 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2011-01-11 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2011-01-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-01-12 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-02-07 — Final disposition recorded
2011-02-07 — Action denying req for recon mailed
2011-03-09 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2011-03-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-03-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-03-20 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2011-04-14 — Final disposition recorded
2011-04-14 — Action denying req for recon mailed
2011-04-20 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2011-04-20 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2011-05-06 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2011-06-03 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2011-06-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-06-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-06-15 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2011-06-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-06-30 — Law office publication review completed
2011-07-13 — Notice of publication
2011-07-13 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2011-07-13 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
2011-08-02 — Published for opposition
2011-09-23 — Change of owner received from ib
2011-10-04 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2011-10-04 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2011-10-18 — Registered-principal register
2012-01-18 — Final disposition recorded
2012-05-30 — Final disposition recorded
2012-05-30 — Final disposition recorded
2012-06-15 — Final disposition recorded
2015-05-21 — New representative at ib received
2016-06-23 — New representative at ib received
2017-09-21 — New representative at ib received
2018-05-25 — Cancelled section 71
2019-01-25 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
2019-02-05 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
2019-02-05 — Invalidation processed
2019-03-15 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
2019-04-17 — Final status recorded
2019-11-08 — Death of international registration
2019-11-08 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg mailed
Owner Information
Dental innovation GmbH
DE
Dental innovation GmbH
DE
Grube, Gerd
DE
Weihe, Stephan
DE
Grube, Gerd
DE
Weihe, Stephan
DE
Correspondent
Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C. 1077 Northern Blvd. Roslyn, NY 11576 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-04-17
Status Date:
2019-04-17
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.