Brandinium

Trademark search for:

DIGITAL BUS KING

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2009-07-06 — Application filed
  • 2009-07-09 — Application filed
  • 2009-07-09 — Application filed
  • 2009-09-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-09-30 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-10-01 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-01-05 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2010-03-08 — Paper received
  • 2010-03-18 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-03-22 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2010-03-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-03-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-03-31 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-04-14 — Notice of publication
  • 2010-05-04 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-06-29 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-12-07 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-12-07 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2010-12-07 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2010-12-09 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2011-06-28 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-06-28 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2011-06-30 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2011-07-05 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2011-07-06 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2011-12-28 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2011-12-28 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2011-12-29 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-12-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2011-12-29 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2012-01-03 — Paper received
  • 2012-01-06 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2012-01-07 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-06-28 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-06-28 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2012-08-07 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2012-08-08 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-12-26 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-12-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2012-12-26 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2012-12-27 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2012-12-28 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2013-01-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2013-06-28 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2013-06-28 — Use amendment filed
  • 2013-07-06 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2013-07-17 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2013-07-19 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2013-07-20 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2013-08-27 — Registered-principal register
  • 2015-08-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-08-27 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2019-08-09 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2019-08-14 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2019-09-17 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2019-09-17 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2019-09-17 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2022-03-21 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2022-03-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2022-03-21 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2022-08-27 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2024-03-08 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2024-03-08 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

MULTIMEDIA LED, INC.
CORONA , CA
Billboard Video, Inc.
Corona , CA
Billboard Video, Inc.
Corona , CA
Billboard Video, Inc.
Corona , CA

Correspondent

Joseph G. Chu JCIP
155 N Lake Avenue, Suite 800
Century Square
Pasadena, CA 91101

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-07-06
Status Date:
2024-03-08
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.