Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2009 ›
GI ›
GINGAHBREAD MAN
Trademark search for:
GINGAHBREAD MAN
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-08-26 — Application filed
2009-09-01 — Application filed
2009-09-02 — Application filed
2009-09-03 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2009-12-01 — Assigned to examiner
2009-12-03 — Final disposition recorded
2009-12-03 — Final disposition recorded
2009-12-03 — Final disposition recorded
2010-03-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-03-09 — Office action issued
2010-03-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-03-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-03-24 — Assigned to lie
2010-03-25 — Law office publication review completed
2010-04-27 — Published for opposition
2010-04-27 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-07-13 — Registered-principal register
2016-07-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-07-11 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2016-09-17 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2016-09-19 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2016-09-19 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2019-07-13 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2021-02-19 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2021-02-19 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Claude A. Lanier
Flossmorr , IL
Claude A. Lanier
Richton Park , IL
Claude A. Lanier
Richton Park , IL
Correspondent
STEPHEN LESAVICH, PHD LESAVICH HIGH-TECH LAW GROUP, S.C. 5008 Green Bay Road, Suite 107 Kenosha, WI 53144 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-08-26
Status Date:
2021-02-19
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.