Brandinium

Trademark search for:

MISS MARC

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2009-02-19 — Application filed
  • 2009-02-23 — Application filed
  • 2009-02-23 — Application filed
  • 2009-05-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-05-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-05-11 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-05-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-06-17 — Office action issued
  • 2009-06-23 — Suspension letter written
  • 2009-06-23 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-06-23 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-06-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-06-23 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-06-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-11-03 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2009-11-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-11-03 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-11-04 — Data modification completed
  • 2009-11-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-11-06 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-12-15 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-12-15 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-03-09 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-04-29 — Fax received
  • 2010-05-11 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-05-11 — Notice of allowance correction entered
  • 2010-09-09 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-09-09 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2010-09-09 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2010-09-11 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-03-09 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-03-09 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2011-03-17 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2011-03-18 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-09-09 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-09-09 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2011-09-14 — Office action issued
  • 2011-10-05 — Office action issued
  • 2011-10-05 — Office action issued
  • 2011-10-11 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2011-10-12 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-03-06 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-03-06 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2012-03-08 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2012-03-09 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-09-06 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-09-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2012-09-06 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2012-09-12 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2012-09-13 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2013-03-01 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2013-03-01 — Use amendment filed
  • 2013-03-01 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2013-03-20 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2013-03-25 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2013-03-26 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2013-04-17 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2013-04-17 — Assigned to lie
  • 2013-04-18 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2013-05-21 — Registered-principal register
  • 2017-05-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2017-05-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2018-05-21 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2019-12-27 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2019-12-27 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Marc Jacobs Trademarks, L.L.C.
New York , NY
Marc Jacobs Trademarks, L.L.C.
New York , NY
Marc Jacobs Trademarks L.L.C.
New York , NY

Correspondent

Jessica M. Garrett Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
575 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-02-19
Status Date:
2019-12-27
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.