Trademark search for:

MODEL2CODE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2009-07-31 — Application filed
2009-08-04 — Application filed
2009-08-04 — Application filed
2009-08-05 — Notice of design search code mailed
2009-11-03 — Assigned to examiner
2009-11-06 — Final disposition recorded
2009-11-06 — Final disposition recorded
2009-11-06 — Final disposition recorded
2010-04-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
2010-04-22 — Office action issued
2010-05-14 — Assigned to lie
2010-05-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-05-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-05-17 — Report unresponsive amendment - completed
2010-05-17 — Notice of unresponsive amendment - e-mailed
2010-05-17 — Notification of notice of unresponsive amendment - e-mailed
2010-07-07 — Office action issued
2010-07-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-07-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-07-09 — Application abandoned
2010-07-16 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
2010-07-16 — Teas petition to revive received
2010-07-16 — Petition to revive-granted
2010-07-16 — Office action issued
2010-11-08 — Petition to revive-received
2010-11-08 — Assigned to petition staff
2011-01-18 — Final status recorded
2011-01-19 — Incomplete petition notice mailed

Owner Information

NETFECTIVE TECHNOLOGY S.A.
SURESNES CEDEX FR

Correspondent

PARQUET AUDREY
79 RUE JEAN JACQUES ROUSSEAU
SURESNES CEDEX, 92158
FRANCE

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-07-31

Status Date:
2011-01-18

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.