Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2009 ›
NE ›
NECROVISION: LOST COMPANY
Trademark search for:
NECROVISION: LOST COMPANY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-02-05 — Application filed
2009-02-09 — Application filed
2009-02-09 — Application filed
2009-02-10 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2009-03-16 — Assigned to examiner
2009-03-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-03-17 — Assigned to lie
2009-03-17 — Law office publication review completed
2009-04-01 — Notice of publication
2009-04-21 — Published for opposition
2009-07-14 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-01-13 — Sou teas extension received
2010-01-13 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-01-13 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-01-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
2010-07-14 — Teas statement of use received
2010-07-14 — Use amendment filed
2010-08-03 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-08-03 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2010-08-03 — Statement of use processing complete
2010-08-05 — Law office registration review completed
2010-08-06 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2010-09-07 — Registered-principal register
2015-09-07 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2017-04-14 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2017-04-14 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
1C Joint Stock Venture
Moscow RU
1C Joint Stock Venture
Moscow RU
1C Joint Stock Venture
Moscow RU
Correspondent
Marvin H. Kleinberg Kleinberg & Lerner, LLP 1875 Century Park East, Suite 1150 Los Angeles, CA 90067-2501 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-02-05
Status Date:
2017-04-14
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.