Brandinium

Trademark search for:

NEOMOTE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2009-01-02 — Application filed
  • 2009-01-06 — Application filed
  • 2009-01-07 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2009-02-23 — Paper received
  • 2009-02-25 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
  • 2009-02-25 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-03-19 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-03-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-03-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-03-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-09-29 — Office action issued
  • 2009-09-29 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2009-09-29 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2009-09-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-09-30 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-10-24 — Office action issued
  • 2009-10-24 — Office action issued
  • 2009-10-24 — Office action issued
  • 2010-01-05 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2010-01-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-01-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-01-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-01-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-01-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-02-03 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2010-02-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-02-03 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2010-02-03 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2010-02-03 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2010-02-05 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-02-19 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2010-02-23 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2010-03-09 — Priority action written
  • 2010-03-09 — Priority action e-mailed
  • 2010-03-09 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
  • 2010-03-17 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2010-03-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-03-17 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2010-03-17 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2010-03-17 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2010-03-17 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-04-20 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-04-20 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-06-15 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-11-08 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2010-11-08 — Use amendment filed
  • 2010-11-19 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-11-22 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2010-12-13 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2010-12-15 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2010-12-16 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2011-01-18 — Registered-principal register
  • 2015-02-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2016-01-18 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2016-12-02 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2017-02-09 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2017-02-09 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2017-02-09 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2017-09-27 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2020-01-18 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2021-08-20 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2021-08-20 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

TOHO ELECTRONICS INC.
SAGAMIHARA-SHI, KANAGAWA JP
Sumitomo Precision Products Co., Ltd.
Hyogo JP
Sumitomo Precision Products Co., Ltd.
Hyogo JP
Sumitomo Precision Products Co., Ltd.
Hyogo JP

Correspondent

Brian B. Darville Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.
1940 Duke Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-01-02
Status Date:
2021-08-20
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.