Trademark search for:

PVID

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2009-10-27 — Application filed
2009-10-30 — Application filed
2009-10-31 — Application filed
2010-02-01 — Assigned to examiner
2010-02-06 — Final disposition recorded
2010-02-12 — Final disposition recorded
2010-08-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
2010-08-11 — Office action issued
2010-08-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-08-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-09-02 — Final disposition recorded
2010-09-02 — Final disposition recorded
2010-09-02 — Final disposition recorded
2010-09-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-09-08 — Office action issued
2010-09-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-09-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-09-20 — Assigned to lie
2010-09-20 — Law office publication review completed
2010-10-26 — Published for opposition
2010-10-26 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-12-21 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-06-10 — Sou teas extension received
2011-06-10 — Sou extension 1 filed
2011-06-10 — Sou extension 1 granted
2011-06-14 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-01-23 — Application abandoned
2012-01-23 — Application abandoned
2012-01-23 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Panduit Corp.
Tinley Park , IL

Panduit Corp.
Tinley Park , IL

Correspondent

Christopher S. Clancy Panduit Corp.
6200 West 175th Street
Legal Dept.
Tinley Park, IL 60477

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-10-27

Status Date:
2012-01-23

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.