Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2009 ›
QD ›
QDRP
Trademark search for:
QDRP
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-07-14 — Application filed
2009-07-17 — Application filed
2009-07-17 — Application filed
2009-10-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-10-14 — Assigned to examiner
2009-10-29 — Assigned to lie
2009-10-29 — Law office publication review completed
2009-11-09 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2009-11-23 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2009-11-25 — Final disposition recorded
2009-11-25 — Final disposition recorded
2009-11-25 — Final disposition recorded
2010-05-24 — Examiners amendment -written
2010-05-24 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2010-05-24 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2010-05-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-05-25 — Examiner's amendment entered
2010-05-27 — Law office publication review completed
2010-06-04 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2010-06-16 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2010-08-02 — Final disposition recorded
2010-08-02 — Final disposition recorded
2010-08-02 — Final disposition recorded
2011-03-04 — Application abandoned
2011-03-04 — Application abandoned
2011-03-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-03-10 — Office action issued
2011-03-10 — Petition to revive-granted
2011-03-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-03-10 — Teas petition to revive received
2011-04-25 — Assigned to examiner
2011-04-26 — Final disposition recorded
2011-04-26 — Final disposition recorded
2011-04-26 — Final disposition recorded
2011-10-25 — Office action issued
2011-10-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-10-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-10-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-10-27 — Law office publication review completed
2011-11-09 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2011-11-29 — Published for opposition
2011-11-29 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-01-24 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-07-17 — Sou teas extension received
2012-07-17 — Sou extension 1 filed
2012-07-27 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2012-08-03 — Sou extension 1 granted
2012-08-04 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-01-08 — Sou teas extension received
2013-01-08 — Sou extension 2 filed
2013-01-10 — Sou extension 2 granted
2013-01-11 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-07-03 — Teas change of owner address received
2013-07-03 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2013-07-11 — Sou teas extension received
2013-07-11 — Sou extension 3 filed
2013-08-09 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2013-08-26 — Sou extension 3 granted
2013-08-27 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-01-07 — Sou teas extension received
2014-01-07 — Sou extension 4 filed
2014-01-16 — Sou extension 4 granted
2014-01-17 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-05-12 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2014-05-12 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2014-06-27 — Sou teas extension received
2014-06-27 — Sou extension 5 filed
2014-07-03 — Sou extension 5 granted
2014-07-04 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2015-03-02 — Application abandoned
2015-03-02 — Application abandoned
2015-03-02 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Nanosys, Inc.
Milpitas , CA
Nanosys, Inc.
Palo Alto , CA
Correspondent
Julie Dalke Latham & Watkins LLP 650 Town Center Drive, Suite 2000 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-07-14
Status Date:
2015-03-02
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.