Brandinium

Trademark search for:

REFLUXCONTROL

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2009-10-29 — Application filed
  • 2009-11-02 — Application filed
  • 2009-11-02 — Application filed
  • 2009-11-03 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2010-01-27 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2010-02-11 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2010-02-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-02-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-02-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-08-16 — Office action issued
  • 2010-09-01 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-09-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-09-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-09-23 — Suspension letter written
  • 2010-09-23 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-09-23 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-03-23 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2011-03-28 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2011-03-28 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-03-28 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-08-30 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2011-08-31 — Suspension letter written
  • 2011-08-31 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-08-31 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-08-31 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-08-31 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-03-01 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2012-03-05 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2012-03-05 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-03-05 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-09-05 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2012-09-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-09-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-09-18 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-09-18 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-09-18 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-04-04 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2013-04-09 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2013-04-09 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-04-09 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-10-07 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2013-10-09 — Suspension letter written
  • 2013-10-09 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-10-09 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-10-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-10-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-04-28 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2014-04-29 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2014-04-29 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-04-29 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-10-21 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2014-10-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-10-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-10-29 — Suspension letter written
  • 2014-10-29 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-10-29 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-05-04 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2015-05-06 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2015-05-06 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-05-06 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-11-04 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2015-11-12 — Suspension letter written
  • 2015-11-12 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-11-12 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-11-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-11-12 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-05-12 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2016-05-12 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-05-12 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-11-10 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2016-11-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-11-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-11-22 — Suspension letter written
  • 2016-11-22 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-11-22 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-05-22 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2017-05-23 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2017-05-23 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-05-23 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-11-22 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2017-11-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2017-11-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2017-11-29 — Suspension letter written
  • 2017-11-29 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-11-29 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-12-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2017-12-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2018-01-02 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2018-01-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-01-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-01-03 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-01-10 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2018-01-10 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2018-01-10 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2018-01-10 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2018-01-30 — Office action issued
  • 2018-01-30 — Office action issued
  • 2018-01-30 — Office action issued
  • 2018-09-04 — Application abandoned
  • 2018-09-04 — Application abandoned
  • 2018-09-04 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Milux Holding S.A.
Luxembourg LU

Correspondent

Ben Natter Haug Partners LLP
745 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10151
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-10-29
Status Date:
2018-09-04
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.