Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2009 ›
SM ›
SMARTVISION FOCUS
Trademark search for:
SMARTVISION FOCUS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-01-16 — Application filed
2009-01-22 — Application filed
2009-01-23 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2009-03-27 — Assigned to examiner
2009-04-08 — Final disposition recorded
2009-04-08 — Final disposition recorded
2009-04-08 — Final disposition recorded
2009-08-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2009-08-24 — Office action issued
2009-08-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2009-09-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-09-01 — Assigned to lie
2009-09-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-10-10 — Final disposition recorded
2009-10-10 — Final disposition recorded
2009-10-10 — Final disposition recorded
2009-10-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-10-30 — Office action issued
2009-10-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-12-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-12-07 — Law office publication review completed
2010-01-12 — Published for opposition
2010-01-12 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-01-25 — Extension of time to oppose received
2010-06-14 — Application abandoned
2010-07-02 — Application abandoned
2010-07-02 — Application abandoned
2010-07-02 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Tony McMahon
Worth , IL
Tony McMahon
Worth , IL
Correspondent
Maureen Beacom Gorman Davis McGrath LLC 125 South Wacker Drive, Suite 1700 Chicago, IL 60606 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-01-16
Status Date:
2010-07-02
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.