Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2009 ›
TI ›
TIANYI-BREW
Trademark search for:
TIANYI-BREW
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-04-20 — Application filed
2009-04-23 — Application filed
2009-04-23 — Application filed
2009-06-17 — Assigned to examiner
2009-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
2009-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
2009-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
2009-12-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-12-15 — Office action issued
2009-12-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-12-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-01-13 — Assigned to lie
2010-01-13 — Law office publication review completed
2010-02-16 — Published for opposition
2010-02-16 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-05-11 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-06-22 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2010-06-22 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2010-11-09 — Sou teas extension received
2010-11-09 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-11-18 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-11-18 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-11-19 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-06-13 — Application abandoned
2011-06-13 — Application abandoned
2011-06-13 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
QUALCOMM Incorporated
San Diego , CA
QUALCOMM Incorporated
San Diego , CA
Correspondent
N. Christopher Norton, Esq. Arent Fox LLP 1050 Connecticut Ave., NW Washington, DC 20036 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-04-20
Status Date:
2011-06-13
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.