Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2009 ›
UP ›
UPCLICK
Trademark search for:
UPCLICK
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-04-17 — Application filed
2009-05-28 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2009-05-29 — Application filed
2009-06-02 — Application filed
2009-07-07 — Assigned to examiner
2009-07-15 — Final disposition recorded
2009-07-16 — Office action issued
2009-07-16 — Office action issued
2009-07-16 — Office action issued
2009-08-28 — Office action issued
2010-02-03 — Paper received
2010-03-01 — Assigned to lie
2010-03-02 — Amendment from applicant entered
2010-03-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-03-15 — Application abandoned
2010-04-12 — Paper received
2010-04-12 — Petition to revive-received
2010-04-19 — Assigned to petition staff
2010-04-20 — Incomplete petition notice mailed
2010-05-05 — Teas response to petition deficiency received
2010-05-11 — Petition granted - response received
2010-05-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-05-17 — Assigned to lie
2010-05-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-06-14 — Final disposition recorded
2010-06-14 — Final disposition recorded
2010-10-29 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2010-10-29 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2010-11-20 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2010-12-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2010-12-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-12-14 — Office action issued
2010-12-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-12-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2011-01-07 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2011-01-07 — Office action issued
2011-01-07 — Office action issued
2011-01-07 — Office action issued
2011-01-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-01-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-01-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-01-11 — Law office publication review completed
2011-01-13 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2011-01-13 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
2011-01-28 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2011-02-10 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2011-02-10 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
2011-02-15 — Published for opposition
2011-02-15 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2011-02-26 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2011-05-03 — Registered-principal register
2011-08-03 — Final disposition recorded
2011-09-22 — Final disposition recorded
2011-09-22 — Final disposition recorded
2013-02-24 — Final disposition recorded
2016-05-03 — Teas section 71 received
2016-05-23 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2016-05-23 — Post registration action mailed - sec.71
2016-08-03 — Office action issued
2016-08-10 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2016-09-15 — Post registration action mailed - sec.71
2016-09-15 — Post registration action mailed - sec.71
2016-10-17 — Office action issued
2016-11-11 — Registered-sec.71 accepted
2016-11-11 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 71 - e-mailed
2019-04-17 — Final status recorded
2019-11-08 — Death of international registration
2019-11-08 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed
Owner Information
Upclick Malta Limited
Sliema MT
Upclick Malta Limited
Sliema MT
Upclick Malta Limited
Sliema MT
Correspondent
Sherry Flax Saul Ewing LLP 500 E. Pratt St. Baltimore, MD 21202 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-04-17
Status Date:
2019-04-17
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.