Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2010 ›
BE ›
BEAUTY PROFILE
Trademark search for:
BEAUTY PROFILE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-09-20 — Application filed
2010-09-23 — Application filed
2010-09-23 — Application filed
2010-12-27 — Assigned to examiner
2010-12-28 — Final disposition recorded
2010-12-29 — Final disposition recorded
2011-06-16 — Office action issued
2011-06-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-06-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-07-18 — Office action issued
2011-07-19 — Office action issued
2011-11-01 — Examiners amendment -written
2011-11-01 — Examiner's amendment entered
2011-11-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-11-02 — Examiners amendment mailed
2011-11-23 — Assigned to lie
2011-11-28 — Law office publication review completed
2011-12-09 — Withdrawn from pub - senior attorney request
2012-01-05 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2012-01-05 — Final disposition recorded
2012-01-06 — Final disposition recorded
2012-07-06 — Office action issued
2012-07-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-07-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-08-12 — Final disposition recorded
2012-08-13 — Final disposition recorded
2012-08-24 — Office action issued
2012-08-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-08-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-09-17 — Office action issued
2012-09-18 — Final disposition recorded
2012-09-18 — Final disposition recorded
2013-03-18 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2013-03-18 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2013-03-18 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2013-03-18 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2013-03-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-03-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-04-10 — Action denying req for recon mailed
2013-04-10 — Final disposition recorded
2013-09-01 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2013-09-02 — Final disposition recorded
2013-09-03 — Final disposition recorded
2014-03-04 — Teas petition to revive received
2014-03-04 — Office action issued
2014-03-06 — Assigned to petition staff
2014-03-11 — Petition granted - response received
2014-03-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-03-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-03-11 — Notice of revival - mailed
2014-04-01 — Examiners amendment -written
2014-04-01 — Examiner's amendment entered
2014-04-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
2014-04-01 — Exparte appeal terminated
2014-04-02 — Examiners amendment mailed
2014-04-04 — Law office publication review completed
2014-04-23 — Notice of publication
2014-05-13 — Published for opposition
2014-07-08 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2015-01-08 — Sou teas extension received
2015-01-08 — Sou extension 1 filed
2015-01-08 — Sou extension 1 granted
2015-01-10 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2015-07-08 — Sou teas extension received
2015-07-08 — Sou extension 2 filed
2015-07-27 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2015-07-27 — Sou extension 2 granted
2015-07-28 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2016-01-08 — Sou teas extension received
2016-01-08 — Sou extension 3 filed
2016-02-12 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2016-02-20 — Sou extension 3 granted
2016-02-23 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2016-08-08 — Application abandoned
2016-08-08 — Application abandoned
2016-08-08 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Carol Tuttle
Draper , UT
Carol Tuttle
Draper , UT
Correspondent
GRANT R CLAYTON CLAYTON HOWARTH & CANNON PC PO BOX 1909 SANDY, UT 84091-1909 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-09-20
Status Date:
2016-08-08
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.