Brandinium

Trademark search for:

BS BUTTON

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2010-10-01 — Application filed
  • 2010-10-05 — Application filed
  • 2010-10-05 — Application filed
  • 2011-01-11 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2011-01-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-01-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-01-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-08-12 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-08-12 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-09-01 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2011-09-01 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2011-09-01 — Office action issued
  • 2011-09-01 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-09-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-09-02 — Office action issued
  • 2011-09-02 — Office action issued
  • 2011-09-02 — Office action issued
  • 2011-09-13 — Undeliverable mail - corresp. remailed
  • 2011-10-30 — Office action issued
  • 2011-11-14 — Assigned to lie
  • 2011-11-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-11-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-12-20 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2011-12-20 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2011-12-20 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2011-12-20 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2011-12-20 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2011-12-20 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2011-12-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2011-12-28 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2012-01-11 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2012-01-31 — Published for opposition
  • 2012-01-31 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2012-03-27 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2012-04-17 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2012-04-17 — Use amendment filed
  • 2012-05-10 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2012-05-15 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2012-06-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-06-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-06-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-06-07 — Office action issued
  • 2012-06-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-06-07 — Office action issued
  • 2012-06-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-06-10 — Office action issued
  • 2012-06-11 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2012-06-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-06-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-06-22 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2012-06-23 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2012-07-31 — Registered-principal register
  • 2017-07-31 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2017-07-31 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2017-07-31 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2017-09-06 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2017-09-06 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2017-09-06 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2021-07-31 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2021-07-31 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2022-01-10 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2022-01-10 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 9
  • 2023-03-11 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)
  • 2023-03-11 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

edwards, brian robert
Las Vegas , NV
edwards, brian robert
Las Vegas , NV
edwards, brian robert
Las Vegas , NV

Correspondent

edwards, brian robert
848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #2379
848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #2379
Las Vegas, NV 89107

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2010-10-01
Status Date:
2023-03-11
Filing Year:
2010

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.