Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2010 ›
CL ›
CLEANLITE EDENEX ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE BY ENHANCING NATURAL ENERGY EXPANSION
Trademark search for:
CLEANLITE EDENEX ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE BY ENHANCING NATURAL ENERGY EXPANSION
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-12-10 — Application filed
2010-12-14 — Application filed
2010-12-14 — Application filed
2010-12-15 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2011-03-15 — Assigned to examiner
2011-03-21 — Final disposition recorded
2011-03-21 — Final disposition recorded
2011-03-21 — Final disposition recorded
2011-09-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-09-21 — Office action issued
2011-09-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-10-05 — Office action issued
2011-10-05 — Office action issued
2011-10-05 — Office action issued
2012-04-05 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2012-04-05 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2012-04-05 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2012-04-05 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2012-04-16 — Assigned to lie
2012-04-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-04-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-04-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2012-04-24 — Exparte appeal terminated
2012-05-01 — Law office publication review completed
2012-05-16 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2012-06-05 — Published for opposition
2012-06-05 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-06-12 — Teas change of correspondence received
2012-07-31 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2013-01-29 — Sou teas extension received
2013-01-29 — Sou extension 1 filed
2013-01-29 — Sou extension 1 granted
2013-01-31 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-07-18 — Sou teas extension received
2013-07-18 — Sou extension 2 filed
2013-08-15 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2013-08-19 — Sou extension 2 granted
2013-08-20 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-01-31 — Sou teas extension received
2014-01-31 — Sou extension 3 filed
2014-01-31 — Sou extension 3 granted
2014-02-04 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-07-21 — Sou teas extension received
2014-07-21 — Sou extension 4 granted
2014-07-21 — Sou extension 4 filed
2014-07-23 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2015-02-02 — Sou teas extension received
2015-02-02 — Sou extension 5 filed
2015-02-19 — Sou extension 5 granted
2015-02-20 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2015-07-31 — Teas statement of use received
2015-07-31 — Use amendment filed
2015-08-02 — Statement of use processing complete
2015-08-10 — Final disposition recorded
2015-08-10 — Final disposition recorded
2015-08-10 — Final disposition recorded
2016-02-07 — Office action issued
2016-02-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-02-12 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-03-02 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2016-03-03 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2016-04-05 — Registered-principal register
2017-07-25 — Teas section 7 request received
2017-07-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-08-15 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2017-08-22 — Amendment under section 7 - processed
2021-04-05 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2022-10-21 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2022-10-21 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
GEM Holding Corp.
Shiga 520-0047 JP
GEM Holding Corp.
Shiga 520-0047 JP
GEM Holding Corp.
Shiga 520-0047 JP
Correspondent
GEM Holding Corp. 4-chome, Hamaotsu, Otsu 8-3-1302 Shiga 520-0047,
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-12-10
Status Date:
2022-10-21
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.