Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2010 ›
CL ›
CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Trademark search for:
CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-02-21 — Application filed
2010-02-24 — Application filed
2010-02-25 — Application filed
2010-05-25 — Examiners amendment -written
2010-05-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-05-25 — Examiner's amendment entered
2010-05-25 — Assigned to examiner
2010-05-26 — Examiner's amendment mailed
2010-06-09 — Assigned to lie
2010-06-10 — Law office publication review completed
2010-06-23 — Notice of publication
2010-07-13 — Published for opposition
2010-09-07 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-03-07 — Sou teas extension received
2011-03-07 — Sou extension 1 filed
2011-03-07 — Sou extension 1 granted
2011-03-09 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2011-08-25 — Sou teas extension received
2011-08-25 — Sou extension 2 filed
2011-08-27 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2011-08-27 — Sou extension 2 granted
2011-08-30 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2012-04-09 — Application abandoned
2012-04-09 — Application abandoned
2012-04-09 — Final status recorded
2012-09-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
Owner Information
Comprehensive NeuroScience, Inc.
White Plains , NY
Comprehensive NeuroScience, Inc.
White Plains , NY
Correspondent
Kevin Oliveira ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, PC 1775 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 400 Reston, VA 20190-5159 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-02-21
Status Date:
2012-04-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.