Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2010 ›
DI ›
DIGITAL CRAFT
Trademark search for:
DIGITAL CRAFT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-12-23 — Application filed
2010-12-27 — Application filed
2011-01-03 — Application filed
2011-03-04 — Assigned to examiner
2011-03-12 — Final disposition recorded
2011-03-12 — Final disposition recorded
2011-03-12 — Final disposition recorded
2011-09-12 — Office action issued
2011-09-12 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-09-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-11-04 — Final disposition recorded
2011-11-04 — Final disposition recorded
2011-11-04 — Final disposition recorded
2012-04-05 — Examiners amendment -written
2012-04-05 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2012-04-05 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2012-04-05 — Examiner's amendment entered
2012-05-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2012-05-30 — Assigned to lie
2012-05-30 — Law office publication review completed
2012-06-13 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2012-07-03 — Published for opposition
2012-07-03 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-08-28 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2013-04-01 — Application abandoned
2013-04-01 — Application abandoned
2013-04-01 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo JP
Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo JP
Correspondent
JOHN E. LYHUS FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY 120 S LASALLE ST STE 1600 CHICAGO, IL 60603-3590 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-12-23
Status Date:
2013-04-01
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.