Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2010 ›
FE ›
FEEPLES
Trademark search for:
FEEPLES
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-06-28 — Application filed
2010-07-01 — Application filed
2010-07-02 — Application filed
2010-10-04 — Assigned to examiner
2010-10-04 — Final disposition recorded
2010-10-04 — Final disposition recorded
2010-10-04 — Final disposition recorded
2011-03-02 — Office action issued
2011-03-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-03-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-03-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-03-21 — Assigned to lie
2011-03-23 — Law office publication review completed
2011-04-26 — Published for opposition
2011-04-26 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2011-06-21 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-12-13 — Sou teas extension received
2011-12-13 — Sou extension 1 filed
2011-12-13 — Sou extension 1 granted
2011-12-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-06-21 — Sou teas extension received
2012-06-21 — Sou extension 2 filed
2012-07-17 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2012-07-17 — Sou extension 2 granted
2012-07-18 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-01-21 — Application abandoned
2013-01-21 — Final status recorded
2013-01-22 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Fee, Barbara J.
Bloomfield Hills , MI
Fee, Barbara J.
Bloomfield Hills , MI
Correspondent
JOHN CHAU GIFFORD, KRASS, SPRINKLE, ANDERSON & CITKOWSKI, P. PO BOX 7021 TROY, MI 48007-7021 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-06-28
Status Date:
2013-01-21
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.