Trademark search for:

LPKF PROTOLASER

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2010-06-09 — Application filed
2010-06-12 — Application filed
2010-06-14 — Teas voluntary amendment received
2010-06-15 — Application filed
2010-06-16 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2010-09-19 — Assigned to examiner
2010-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
2010-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
2010-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
2010-10-21 — Office action issued
2010-11-06 — Assigned to lie
2010-11-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-11-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-11-28 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-12-06 — Law office publication review completed
2011-01-11 — Published for opposition
2011-01-11 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2011-03-29 — Registered-principal register
2017-02-02 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2017-04-01 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2017-04-01 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2017-04-01 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2020-03-29 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2021-11-19 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2021-11-19 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

LPKF Laser & Electronics AG
Garbsen DE

LPKF Laser & Electronics AG
Garbsen DE

LPKF Laser & Electronics AG
Garbsen DE

Correspondent

Claudia W. Stangle LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER, LTD.
Two Prudential Plaza, 180 N. Stetson Ave
Suite 4900
CHICAGO, IL 60601

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2010-06-09

Status Date:
2021-11-19

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2010

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.