Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2010 ›
OP ›
OPSCHEF
Trademark search for:
OPSCHEF
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-02-12 — Application filed
2010-02-16 — Application filed
2010-02-18 — Application filed
2010-05-14 — Assigned to examiner
2010-05-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-05-27 — Assigned to lie
2010-05-27 — Law office publication review completed
2010-06-29 — Published for opposition
2010-06-29 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-08-24 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-02-24 — Sou teas extension received
2011-02-24 — Sou extension 1 filed
2011-03-08 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2011-03-08 — Sou extension 1 granted
2011-03-09 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-08-24 — Sou teas extension received
2011-08-24 — Sou extension 2 filed
2011-08-30 — Sou extension 2 granted
2011-08-31 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-02-24 — Sou teas extension received
2012-02-24 — Sou extension 3 filed
2012-03-01 — Sou extension 3 granted
2012-03-02 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-09-24 — Application abandoned
2012-09-24 — Application abandoned
2012-09-24 — Final status recorded
2015-01-15 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2015-01-15 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
Owner Information
OpsCode, Inc.
Seattle , WA
OpsCode, Inc.
Seattle , WA
Correspondent
James J. Carter Seed IP Law Group PLLC 701 Fifth Avenue Suite 5400 Seattle, WA 98104
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-02-12
Status Date:
2012-09-24
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.