Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2011 ›
BL ›
BLAV
Trademark search for:
BLAV
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-06-10 — Application filed
2011-06-14 — Application filed
2011-06-15 — Application filed
2011-08-22 — Teas amendment entered before attorney assigned
2011-08-22 — Teas voluntary amendment received
2011-09-23 — Assigned to examiner
2011-09-25 — Suspension letter written
2011-09-25 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2011-09-25 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2012-03-26 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2012-03-26 — Suspension inquiry written
2012-03-26 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2012-03-26 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2012-04-06 — Assigned to lie
2012-04-12 — Suspension letter written
2012-04-12 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2012-04-12 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2012-04-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-04-12 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-10-12 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2012-10-16 — Suspension inquiry written
2012-10-16 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2012-10-16 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2013-04-10 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2013-04-18 — Suspension letter written
2013-04-18 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-04-18 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-04-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-04-18 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-10-22 — Suspension inquiry written
2013-10-22 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2013-10-22 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2014-04-22 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2014-05-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-05-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-05-07 — Suspension letter written
2014-05-07 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-05-07 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-11-12 — Suspension inquiry written
2014-11-12 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2014-11-12 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2014-11-12 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2015-04-30 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2015-05-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-05-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-05-12 — Suspension letter written
2015-05-12 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-05-12 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-10-05 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2015-10-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-10-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-10-27 — Final disposition recorded
2015-10-27 — Final disposition recorded
2015-10-27 — Final disposition recorded
2016-04-26 — Office action issued
2016-04-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-04-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-04-28 — Approved for pub - principal register
2016-05-05 — Law office publication review completed
2016-05-18 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2016-06-07 — Published for opposition
2016-06-07 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2016-08-23 — Registered-principal register
2021-08-23 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2023-03-10 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2023-03-10 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
PMOVIL ARGENTINA S.A.
Buenos Aires AR
PMOVIL ARGENTINA S.A.
Buenos Aires AR
PMOVIL ARGENTINA S.A.
Buenos Aires AR
Correspondent
ARTURO PÉREZ-GUERRERO LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PÉREZ-GUERRERO P.O. BOX 9024163 SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-06-10
Status Date:
2023-03-10
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.