Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2011 ›
CO ›
COMBAT WINGS
Trademark search for:
COMBAT WINGS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-09-01 — Application filed
2011-09-05 — Application filed
2011-09-07 — Application filed
2011-12-20 — Assigned to examiner
2011-12-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
2012-01-25 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2012-02-14 — Published for opposition
2012-02-14 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-04-10 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-09-28 — Sou teas extension received
2012-09-28 — Sou extension 1 filed
2012-09-28 — Sou extension 1 granted
2012-10-02 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-02-27 — Sou teas extension received
2013-02-27 — Sou extension 2 filed
2013-03-11 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2013-03-11 — Sou extension 2 granted
2013-03-12 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-07-02 — Teas change of owner address received
2013-07-02 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2013-07-10 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2013-10-02 — Sou teas extension received
2013-10-02 — Sou extension 3 filed
2013-10-07 — Sou extension 3 granted
2013-10-08 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-04-01 — Sou teas extension received
2014-04-01 — Sou extension 4 filed
2014-04-10 — Sou extension 4 granted
2014-04-11 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-09-30 — Sou teas extension received
2014-09-30 — Sou extension 5 filed
2014-10-03 — Sou extension 5 granted
2014-10-04 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2015-01-09 — Teas statement of use received
2015-01-09 — Use amendment filed
2015-01-22 — Statement of use processing complete
2015-02-23 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2015-02-24 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2015-03-31 — Registered-principal register
2015-09-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
2018-07-10 — Teas change of owner address received
2018-07-10 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2020-02-18 — Teas change of owner address received
2020-02-18 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2020-02-18 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2020-02-18 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2020-02-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
2020-03-31 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2020-05-11 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2020-07-28 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2020-07-28 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 15
2020-07-28 — Office action issued
2020-08-26 — Post registration action mailed no response required
2020-08-27 — Office action issued
2020-11-17 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2020-11-24 — Review of correspondence complete - information made of record
2021-07-23 — Teas change of owner address received
2021-07-23 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-07-23 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-07-23 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
2021-07-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-07-23 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2023-08-23 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2025-10-10 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2025-10-10 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
CI GAMES SE
CI GAMES S.A.
CI GAMES S.A.
City Interactive S.A.
City Interactive S.A.
Correspondent
Jim Charne LAW OFFICES JAMES I CHARNE
Filing Details
Filing Date:
Status Date:
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.
